TVA discusses pros and cons of nuclear power

By: Mike McCarthy
By: Mike McCarthy

Knoxville (WVLT) - A nuclear war of words was launched in Knoxville.

The Tennessee Valley Unitarian Universalist Church hosted a public forum on the pros and cons of nuclear power Monday night. It centered on TVA's decision to complete it's second nuclear unit at the Watts Bar Plant and possibly build a new plant in Alabama.

Volunteer TV's Mike McCarthy was at the forum and as the story.

It's nuclear war....at least of words.

"There's a number of reasons we're concerned," said Stephen Smith of the Southern Alliance for Clean Energy.

"Nuclear power can play an important role in energy transformation," said Jerry Paul, Distinguished Fellow on Energy Policy.

Knoxville's Unitarian Universalist Church hosted the "Nuclear Power: Pro and Con" discussion Monday night. The reason: TVA's role in the nationwide reactor revival. TVA has three nuclear power plants. It's committed to completing the two-point-five billion dollar unit two reactor at the Watts Bar Plant. Also, it's considering a seven to nine billion dollar new plant in Bellefonte, Alabama.

"I think it can be one component of developing a broader package of emmission-free, clean, safe, baseload energy," Paul said.

Jerry Paul's with UT's Howard Baker Junior Center for public policy. He doesn't side with TVA or any program, but points to France's heavy reliance on nuclear power as to why it can be good.

"They, for that, have the cleanest energy in Europe and the cheapest energy in Europe," Paul said.

Stephen Smith's with the Southern Alliance for Clean Energy. He says nuclear power takes too much money, too much water, and makes too much waste.

"We would like to see a greater investment in renewables because the reality is TVA already gets 20 percent of it's power from nuclear power," Smith said.

TVA couldn't talk on camera, but says an annual two-percent power demand increase makes nuclear investment necessary.

"TVA's been here. at that time they were going to build 17 nuclear power plant. They only got 8 or 9 up and running, and it cost 20 plus billion dollars, we're still paying for that," Smith said.

Everyone can agree....energy conversation will save TVA and you money.

TVA hasn't officially decided to build the Bellefonte plant. It's just trying to get the license for the option.

If all goes smoothly, TVA will could it in three and half years. Construction could be done around 2018.


You must be logged in to post comments.

Username:
Password (case sensitive):
Remember Me:

Read Comments

Join the Conversation!

While WVLT allows comments on articles, we ask that you respect the online community. Comments may be removed at any time for violations including:

  • Obscenity, profanity, vulgarity, racism, violent descriptions, name-calling or personal attacks.
  • Abuse of multiple accounts.
  • Off-topic comments.

Comments may be checked for inappropriate content or rule violation, but the station is under no legal obligation to monitor or remove comments. If you believe a comment violates the above rules, please use the Flagging Tool to alert a Moderator. 
Flagging does not guarantee removal.

  • by John Shacter Location: Kingston, TN on Jul 27, 2008 at 12:19 PM
    It takes foreign nations only 3-4 years to construct a nuclear plant. Antinukes have severely lengthened that period to about 13 years. And now they are telling us that nuclear construction takes too long and is therefore too expensive? That's a lot of bull. Look at France and a number of other nations. Nuclear can and should be more than fully competitive with coal fired plants, and it should be environmentally clean. Thanks - John Shacter 376-7600
  • by Karen Hadden Location: SEED Coalition on Mar 26, 2008 at 07:41 PM
    Nuclear plants would divert funding needed for energy efficiency and renewable energy, such as solar and wind power, safe solutions to the global warming problem that we can put in place today. Nuclear power uses huge amounts of water, and Browns Ferry had to shut down last year due to drought. Worst of all, there is no storage solution to radioactive waste. Exposure to radionuclides can cause cancer, and the ultimate catastrophe, a meltdown, could cost thousands of lives. The security risks are great. Cleaner, safer energy is needed for our future.
  • by E Location: Knoxville on Mar 25, 2008 at 12:42 PM
    We need solutions to climate change NOW. A nuclear plant built in 2018 is not a solution . Conserving energy TODAY will have the greatest benefit for ratapayers and for reducing global warming pollution.

WVLT VOLUNTEER TV

6450 Papermill Drive Knoxville, TN 37919 Phone - (865) 450-8888; Fax - (865) 450-8869
Copyright © 2015 WVLT-TV Inc. - Designed by Gray Digital Media - Powered by Clickability 16971251 - local8now.com/a?a=16971251
Gray Television, Inc.